Could ECB Rate Cuts Beat the Fed to the Punch?

2024年3月11日
4 min read

Although markets expect both the Fed and the ECB to cut rates over the summer, macro developments could change that forecast.

As inflation continues to ease across the developed world, markets are eager for the rate-cutting cycle to begin. The US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank (ECB) will review monetary policy at their summer meetings, and investors expect both to start cutting at that stage. That’s a realistic central case, in our view, based on published economic data. 

But another factor could influence the batting order: each central bank has its own specific mandate that determines its policy response to changes in the economy.

The US economy—particularly labor markets—remains strong, prompting concerns that US inflation won’t fall as fast as expected and that the Fed may delay its first cut, perhaps for some time. In those circumstances, would the ECB stand still? 

Varying Mandates Create Different Motivations

While the Fed’s dual mandate includes both inflation and unemployment targets, the ECB is mandated to focus exclusively on price stability, keeping inflation near but below 2%. So, we think the ECB would likely cut rates if the Fed were to delay the start of its cutting cycle, as long as euro-area inflation stays on a sustainable downward course toward the target.

The ECB’s decision-making should follow three principles. Essentially, the governing council must evaluate: 1) how effectively monetary policy is working to curb inflationary pressures; 2) if the underlying core components of inflation are falling and; 3) the outlook for inflation, based on available data. 

The bank has stressed that it remains committed to evaluating new data as they become available, and to considering possible second-round effects in its decision-making. But based on the data we have now, we think the way would be clear for the ECB to cut first. 

Monetary-policy transmission remains effective, evidenced by tighter credit conditions and slower credit growth. Headline inflation has fallen significantly in 2023 and continues to decline faster than expected. And though core inflation—specifically services inflation—remains slightly more stubborn, it’s slowly following a similar downward path despite strong wage pressures. 

Furthermore, the ECB’s March forecast and projections showed further falls in inflation ahead: headline inflation is expected to be 2.0% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2026. Essentially, inflation is already at target in the medium term, and further downward revisions are more than likely in June. 

On the hawkish side, some members of the ECB governing council remain preoccupied by wage increases. But we think the data will allay their fears: wage growth slowed slightly in the fourth quarter of 2023 and is expected to ease further in 2024 (Display).

Therefore, we believe all the necessary macroeconomic conditions will be met in the next few months for the ECB to start cutting rates in June.

Euro-Area Inflation Signals Are Pointing Down
Credit Conditions Have Tightened and Core Services Inflation Is Falling
Credit conditions have tightened with loan growth near zero, core services inflation is falling, though wages remain sticky.

Current and historical analyses do not guarantee future results.
As of December 31, 2023 (Negotiated Wages), January 31, 2024 (Credit Data and Momentum) and February 29, 2024 (Services Inflation) 
Source: ECB, Haver and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Timing and Growth Are Important Factors, Too

While inflation metrics are the primary drivers for ECB decision-making, the governing council will still carefully consider the question of timing and the impact of its decisions on euro-area economic growth.

The ECB could still postpone its own decision—but in our view, only until the July governing council meeting, and driven only by domestic considerations. ECB speakers (from hawks to doves) have mentioned June as a likely start point. And during the press conference following the March meeting, ECB president Christine Lagarde mentioned that the governing council has already started to discuss dialing back its restrictive policy stance. A further delay would be met with strong pushback from the doves and would hurt a struggling euro-area economy, potentially risking inflation coming in well below the 2% target in the medium term.

So, sustaining economic growth isn’t a formal ECB objective, but it would be a mistake for the governing council to keep rates unnecessarily high, hurting the economy and further widening the performance gap with the US. In terms of real growth, the US has conspicuously outperformed its pre-pandemic trend while the eurozone has barely recovered to it. The main drivers: different domestic-demand patterns across both regions, where the gap has massively widened since the start of the pandemic (Display). The same trend is evident across consumption and investment.

Growth Performance Favors Earlier ECB Cuts
The Euro-Area Economy Is Lagging the US
The euro-area economy is lagging the US, exemplified by weaker real GDP growth and weaker private demand growth.

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
As of December 31, 2023
Source: BEA, Eurostat and AB

While the Fed can take its time to ponder inflation data against the backdrop of a strong domestic economy, the ECB is under more pressure. Euro-area growth is expected to pick up in the second half of 2024 but remain weak. And Germany, the largest economy, faces structural challenges that need time to resolve. Given these tough domestic constraints, we think the euro-area situation and outlook are shouting for rate cuts to start sooner rather than later.

Implications for Investors

Of course, this ECB-first scenario may not materialize. But if it does, investors need to be ready.

If the ECB leads the rate-cutting cycle, investors will see both lower euro rates and likely a weaker euro currency than the market currently expects. That has implications for positioning across both the yield curve and currencies.

ECB rate cuts would prompt falling euro-denominated bond yields, boosting prices. In this scenario, investors should benefit from holding euro bonds with the most sensitivity to changes in interest rates (the longest duration). Ultimately, lower rates should also boost consumption and investment, stimulating growth and supporting corporate issuers.

While euro-denominated bond prices will likely rise, investors should take care that currency losses from a weakening euro don’t offset their price gains. For instance, US investors should consider hedging their euro exposure back to US dollars.

As ever, it’s better to be forewarned and forearmed.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to change over time.

Investment involves risk. The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed here may change at any time after the date of this publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. AllianceBernstein L.P. does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. It does not take an investor's personal investment objectives or financial situation into account; investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer of solicitation for the purchase or sale of, any financial instrument, product or service sponsored by AllianceBernstein or its affiliates. This presentation is issued by AllianceBernstein Hong Kong Limited (聯博香港有限公司) and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.


About the Authors