Similarly, stocks have done well when interest rates rose (Display above, right). Over 18 periods of rising US Treasury yields since 1971, global stocks gained an average of 14% a year, according to our research. Rising rates don’t typically hurt stock returns as they usually accompany an acceleration of economic growth and corporate earnings.
To be sure, investors should prepare for inflation. Portfolio managers should check that their holdings are positioned for inflation; for example, companies with pricing power have an advantage in an inflationary environment. Make sure equity allocations are diversified across stocks that may respond differently to a return of moderate inflation and higher interest rates. And consider allocating to real assets, such as real estate or commodities, which tend to perform well when inflation rises.
Risk 2: The Swinging Style Pendulum
Interest rates do, of course, have a profound effect on different types of stocks. Rising rates increase the discount rate that investors use for valuing equities. This suppresses price/earnings multiples, particularly for growth stocks, which tend to have cash flows and earnings in the more distant future. Value stocks often perform better when rates rise.
This may explain the sharp style swings in the first quarter as investors began to digest how different stocks would perform in the changing environment. Valuations of hypergrowth stocks with especially inflated multiples fell back to earth while value stocks outperformed.
The recent rate and style volatility have provided a real-world test of portfolio sensitivity to rising rates. For investors with large allocations to growth and underweights to value, it may be time to reassess. Even after recent gains, global value stocks traded at a 51% discount to growth stocks at the end of February, following several years of extreme underperformance. As a result, we think value stocks still have recovery potential. For growth stocks, it’s important to verify that holdings have solid business drivers and resilient cash flows to support sustainable returns if multiples come under pressure.
Stocks in the middle—such as lower-volatility stocks—were shunned throughout the pandemic. Many defensive sectors, such as consumer staples and utilities, trade at attractive valuations and could help provide a cushion for volatility. Indeed, amid nervous trading in late March, there were signs that these lower-beta stocks might again be playing their traditional risk-reduction role.
Risk 3: Market Behavior Risks: From US Retail Investors to Hedge Funds
More instability could result from trading trends seen during the quarter. In particular, the early-year meme darlings episode reflects a sharp increase in retail trading of US stocks, facilitated by popular trading apps and an increase in spare cash driven by the US stimulus program.
These trends won’t disappear, especially with more stimulus checks heading to US citizens. Portfolio managers can monitor unusual retail trading activity by scraping big data from popular trading boards, which can provide an early warning signal for a potential single-stock frenzy. We don’t think these trends present a systemic risk to US markets. However, with US households holding much more of their wealth in equities, as shown above, they’re more exposed to a potential market correction.
These types of market volatility can create opportunities for active managers. Indeed, markets with a high proportion of retail investors—such as the China A Shares market—tend to be prone to swings in sentiment. This often leads to inefficiencies that can be exploited by active, long-term investors, who identify stocks with valuations that have become disconnected from fundamentals.
Risk 4: Return to the New Normal
Many companies’ fundamentals were impaired by the pandemic. When economic shutdowns began, business visibility disappeared, particularly in hard-hit industries.
As economies reopen, many questions remain unanswered. How will consumers and businesses recalibrate spending for the new normal? Will some industries face oversupply, for example, of aircraft, hotel rooms or office space? If rates rise, will debt-laden companies face financing risks? How will extraordinary fiscal policy deployed to bring economies back to normal affect different companies? And what about geopolitical risk—which dropped off radar screens last year but may become more prominent post-pandemic?
There aren’t simple answers. But these questions all point to the importance of highly selective stockpicking through the recovery.
To understand how companies are positioned for the new normal requires independent research of their businesses. Demand must be assessed in real time, using new data analysis techniques to determine which companies have adjusted well from crisis to recovery. Financing risk warrants thorough scrutiny of balance sheets to identify companies that didn’t prudently manage their debt amid low interest rates. In the US, higher corporate taxes could push down future earnings, though some companies will enjoy a fiscal windfall from Biden’s infrastructure plan. Political risk is hard to predict; for example, we still don’t have a good idea of the Biden administration’s trade policy plans. But company exposures to specific political risks can be pinpointed to help ensure that a portfolio isn’t too vulnerable to some of the biggest hazards.
Steering Through Sentiment to Sustainable Returns
Perhaps the biggest overriding risk that surfaced in early 2021 is the power of a sentiment-driven market. Intense sentiment can seduce investors to forget about fundamentals. Piling into a single group of stocks that is suddenly breaking out can be tempting, but it isn’t a recipe for long-term investing success.
Positioning for the recovery requires rising above headline noise. With a clear framing of the risks, investors can develop high conviction in the companies that are best placed to overcome hurdles and deliver long-term investment returns as the world economy and markets get back to business as usual.