European Tariff Talks: Does the US Hold All the Cards?

24 April 2025
2 min read
The US Trade Deficit with the EU Has Increased Significantly
A line shows the US trade deficit growing since 2009; behind it, bar charts track the trade balances in goods and services.

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
As of January 1, 2024
Source: Eurostat

The US is running a substantial net trade deficit with the European Union (EU). Europe has a surplus—but with more exports at risk, it also has the weaker position in a potential trade conflict.

Despite earlier (now paused) tariff countermeasures, and more recent rumors of potential trade restrictions, we think negotiation is the EU’s best tool. During the 90-day tariff pause period, the EU will use diplomacy to try to remove the new US tariffs altogether while resisting any new ones, such as potential levies on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.

If the US tariffs remain in place or are increased, the EU has a further option: to impose tariffs on US services exports to the eurozone. While the US administration highlights the country’s traded goods deficit with the eurozone, the US has a surplus when it comes to services.

The EU could also go as far as to invoke the wide-ranging anti-coercion instrument, but this bold step would be unlikely, particularly versus a trading partner and ally as powerful as the US.

EU leaders have a further problem: high US trade tariffs on Chinese products. These will likely divert Chinese goods to third countries—notably euro-area nations—at low prices.  A major redirection of trade flows to the eurozone would challenge both the current trade balance with China and Europe’s industries. The EU is already discussing the situation with China and is about to set up a special task force to track Chinese imports. However, a specific bargain with China might be unacceptable to the US and reignite tariff friction, potentially resulting in higher US tariff rates for the eurozone.

Alternatively, the EU could impose tariffs and/or enact specific anti-dumping measures to limit the flood of Chinese imports and manage their prices. Calibrating these measures would be a highly difficult balancing act: they would need to be tough enough to prevent price falls in the eurozone, but not to deter trade with China altogether.

The EU finds itself in a sorely testing position—not one but two of its biggest trading partners have powerful cards to play.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

Investment involves risk. The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed here may change at any time after the date of this publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. AllianceBernstein L.P. does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. It does not take an investor's personal investment objectives or financial situation into account; investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer of solicitation for the purchase or sale of, any financial instrument, product or service sponsored by AllianceBernstein or its affiliates. This presentation is issued by AllianceBernstein Hong Kong Limited (聯博香港有限公司) and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.


About the Author